The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF).

(0) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(m)) → false
eq(s(n), 0) → false
eq(s(n), s(m)) → eq(n, m)
le(0, m) → true
le(s(n), 0) → false
le(s(n), s(m)) → le(n, m)
min(cons(0, nil)) → 0
min(cons(s(n), nil)) → s(n)
min(cons(n, cons(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), cons(n, cons(m, x)))
if_min(true, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(n, x))
if_min(false, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(m, x))
replace(n, m, nil) → nil
replace(n, m, cons(k, x)) → if_replace(eq(n, k), n, m, cons(k, x))
if_replace(true, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(m, x)
if_replace(false, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(k, replace(n, m, x))
sort(nil) → nil
sort(cons(n, x)) → cons(min(cons(n, x)), sort(replace(min(cons(n, x)), n, x)))

Rewrite Strategy: FULL

(1) DecreasingLoopProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Ω(n¹):
The rewrite sequence
eq(s(n), s(m)) →⁺ eq(n, m)
gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [].
The pumping substitution is [n / s(n), m / s(m)].
The result substitution is [ ].

(2) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)

(3) RenamingProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Renamed function symbols to avoid clashes with predefined symbol.

(4) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity Relative TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0', 0') → true
eq(0', s(m)) → false
eq(s(n), 0') → false
eq(s(n), s(m)) → eq(n, m)
le(0', m) → true
le(s(n), 0') → false
le(s(n), s(m)) → le(n, m)
min(cons(0', nil)) → 0'
min(cons(s(n), nil)) → s(n)
min(cons(n, cons(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), cons(n, cons(m, x)))
if_min(true, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(n, x))
if_min(false, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(m, x))
replace(n, m, nil) → nil
replace(n, m, cons(k, x)) → if_replace(eq(n, k), n, m, cons(k, x))
if_replace(true, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(m, x)
if_replace(false, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(k, replace(n, m, x))
sort(nil) → nil
sort(cons(n, x)) → cons(min(cons(n, x)), sort(replace(min(cons(n, x)), n, x)))

S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: FULL

(5) TypeInferenceProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)

Infered types.

(6) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
eq(0', 0') → true
eq(0', s(m)) → false
eq(s(n), 0') → false
eq(s(n), s(m)) → eq(n, m)
le(0', m) → true
le(s(n), 0') → false
le(s(n), s(m)) → le(n, m)
min(cons(0', nil)) → 0'
min(cons(s(n), nil)) → s(n)
min(cons(n, cons(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), cons(n, cons(m, x)))
if_min(true, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(n, x))
if_min(false, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(m, x))
replace(n, m, nil) → nil
replace(n, m, cons(k, x)) → if_replace(eq(n, k), n, m, cons(k, x))
if_replace(true, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(m, x)
if_replace(false, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(k, replace(n, m, x))
sort(nil) → nil
sort(cons(n, x)) → cons(min(cons(n, x)), sort(replace(min(cons(n, x)), n, x)))

Types:
eq :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
0' :: 0':s
true :: true:false
s :: 0':s → 0':s
false :: true:false
le :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
min :: nil:cons → 0':s
cons :: 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
nil :: nil:cons
if_min :: true:false → nil:cons → 0':s
replace :: 0':s → 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
if_replace :: true:false → 0':s → 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
sort :: nil:cons → nil:cons
hole_true:false1_0 :: true:false
hole_0':s2_0 :: 0':s
hole_nil:cons3_0 :: nil:cons
gen_0':s4_0 :: Nat → 0':s
gen_nil:cons5_0 :: Nat → nil:cons

(7) OrderProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Heuristically decided to analyse the following defined symbols:
eq, le, min, replace, sort

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
eq < replace
le < min
min < sort
replace < sort

(8) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
eq(0', 0') → true
eq(0', s(m)) → false
eq(s(n), 0') → false
eq(s(n), s(m)) → eq(n, m)
le(0', m) → true
le(s(n), 0') → false
le(s(n), s(m)) → le(n, m)
min(cons(0', nil)) → 0'
min(cons(s(n), nil)) → s(n)
min(cons(n, cons(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), cons(n, cons(m, x)))
if_min(true, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(n, x))
if_min(false, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(m, x))
replace(n, m, nil) → nil
replace(n, m, cons(k, x)) → if_replace(eq(n, k), n, m, cons(k, x))
if_replace(true, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(m, x)
if_replace(false, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(k, replace(n, m, x))
sort(nil) → nil
sort(cons(n, x)) → cons(min(cons(n, x)), sort(replace(min(cons(n, x)), n, x)))

Types:
eq :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
0' :: 0':s
true :: true:false
s :: 0':s → 0':s
false :: true:false
le :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
min :: nil:cons → 0':s
cons :: 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
nil :: nil:cons
if_min :: true:false → nil:cons → 0':s
replace :: 0':s → 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
if_replace :: true:false → 0':s → 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
sort :: nil:cons → nil:cons
hole_true:false1_0 :: true:false
hole_0':s2_0 :: 0':s
hole_nil:cons3_0 :: nil:cons
gen_0':s4_0 :: Nat → 0':s
gen_nil:cons5_0 :: Nat → nil:cons

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s4_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s4_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s4_0(x))
gen_nil:cons5_0(0) ⇔ nil
gen_nil:cons5_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ cons(0', gen_nil:cons5_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
eq, le, min, replace, sort

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
eq < replace
le < min
min < sort
replace < sort

(9) RewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Proved the following rewrite lemma:
eq(gen_0':s4_0(n7_0), gen_0':s4_0(n7_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n7₀)

Induction Base:
eq(gen_0':s4_0(0), gen_0':s4_0(0)) →_R^Ω(1)
true

Induction Step:
eq(gen_0':s4_0(+(n7_0, 1)), gen_0':s4_0(+(n7_0, 1))) →_R^Ω(1)
eq(gen_0':s4_0(n7_0), gen_0':s4_0(n7_0)) →_IH
true

We have rt ∈ Ω(n¹) and sz ∈ O(n). Thus, we have irc_R ∈ Ω(n).

(10) Complex Obligation (BEST)

(11) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
eq(0', 0') → true
eq(0', s(m)) → false
eq(s(n), 0') → false
eq(s(n), s(m)) → eq(n, m)
le(0', m) → true
le(s(n), 0') → false
le(s(n), s(m)) → le(n, m)
min(cons(0', nil)) → 0'
min(cons(s(n), nil)) → s(n)
min(cons(n, cons(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), cons(n, cons(m, x)))
if_min(true, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(n, x))
if_min(false, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(m, x))
replace(n, m, nil) → nil
replace(n, m, cons(k, x)) → if_replace(eq(n, k), n, m, cons(k, x))
if_replace(true, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(m, x)
if_replace(false, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(k, replace(n, m, x))
sort(nil) → nil
sort(cons(n, x)) → cons(min(cons(n, x)), sort(replace(min(cons(n, x)), n, x)))

Types:
eq :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
0' :: 0':s
true :: true:false
s :: 0':s → 0':s
false :: true:false
le :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
min :: nil:cons → 0':s
cons :: 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
nil :: nil:cons
if_min :: true:false → nil:cons → 0':s
replace :: 0':s → 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
if_replace :: true:false → 0':s → 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
sort :: nil:cons → nil:cons
hole_true:false1_0 :: true:false
hole_0':s2_0 :: 0':s
hole_nil:cons3_0 :: nil:cons
gen_0':s4_0 :: Nat → 0':s
gen_nil:cons5_0 :: Nat → nil:cons

Lemmas:
eq(gen_0':s4_0(n7_0), gen_0':s4_0(n7_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n7₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s4_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s4_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s4_0(x))
gen_nil:cons5_0(0) ⇔ nil
gen_nil:cons5_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ cons(0', gen_nil:cons5_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
le, min, replace, sort

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
le < min
min < sort
replace < sort

(12) RewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Proved the following rewrite lemma:
le(gen_0':s4_0(n564_0), gen_0':s4_0(n564_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n564₀)

Induction Base:
le(gen_0':s4_0(0), gen_0':s4_0(0)) →_R^Ω(1)
true

Induction Step:
le(gen_0':s4_0(+(n564_0, 1)), gen_0':s4_0(+(n564_0, 1))) →_R^Ω(1)
le(gen_0':s4_0(n564_0), gen_0':s4_0(n564_0)) →_IH
true

We have rt ∈ Ω(n¹) and sz ∈ O(n). Thus, we have irc_R ∈ Ω(n).

(13) Complex Obligation (BEST)

(14) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
eq(0', 0') → true
eq(0', s(m)) → false
eq(s(n), 0') → false
eq(s(n), s(m)) → eq(n, m)
le(0', m) → true
le(s(n), 0') → false
le(s(n), s(m)) → le(n, m)
min(cons(0', nil)) → 0'
min(cons(s(n), nil)) → s(n)
min(cons(n, cons(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), cons(n, cons(m, x)))
if_min(true, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(n, x))
if_min(false, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(m, x))
replace(n, m, nil) → nil
replace(n, m, cons(k, x)) → if_replace(eq(n, k), n, m, cons(k, x))
if_replace(true, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(m, x)
if_replace(false, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(k, replace(n, m, x))
sort(nil) → nil
sort(cons(n, x)) → cons(min(cons(n, x)), sort(replace(min(cons(n, x)), n, x)))

Types:
eq :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
0' :: 0':s
true :: true:false
s :: 0':s → 0':s
false :: true:false
le :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
min :: nil:cons → 0':s
cons :: 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
nil :: nil:cons
if_min :: true:false → nil:cons → 0':s
replace :: 0':s → 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
if_replace :: true:false → 0':s → 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
sort :: nil:cons → nil:cons
hole_true:false1_0 :: true:false
hole_0':s2_0 :: 0':s
hole_nil:cons3_0 :: nil:cons
gen_0':s4_0 :: Nat → 0':s
gen_nil:cons5_0 :: Nat → nil:cons

Lemmas:
eq(gen_0':s4_0(n7_0), gen_0':s4_0(n7_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n7₀)
le(gen_0':s4_0(n564_0), gen_0':s4_0(n564_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n564₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s4_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s4_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s4_0(x))
gen_nil:cons5_0(0) ⇔ nil
gen_nil:cons5_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ cons(0', gen_nil:cons5_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
min, replace, sort

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
min < sort
replace < sort

(15) RewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Proved the following rewrite lemma:
min(gen_nil:cons5_0(+(1, n893_0))) → gen_0':s4_0(0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n893₀)

Induction Base:
min(gen_nil:cons5_0(+(1, 0))) →_R^Ω(1)
0'

Induction Step:
min(gen_nil:cons5_0(+(1, +(n893_0, 1)))) →_R^Ω(1)
if_min(le(0', 0'), cons(0', cons(0', gen_nil:cons5_0(n893_0)))) →_L^Ω(1)
if_min(true, cons(0', cons(0', gen_nil:cons5_0(n893_0)))) →_R^Ω(1)
min(cons(0', gen_nil:cons5_0(n893_0))) →_IH
gen_0':s4_0(0)

We have rt ∈ Ω(n¹) and sz ∈ O(n). Thus, we have irc_R ∈ Ω(n).

(16) Complex Obligation (BEST)

(17) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
eq(0', 0') → true
eq(0', s(m)) → false
eq(s(n), 0') → false
eq(s(n), s(m)) → eq(n, m)
le(0', m) → true
le(s(n), 0') → false
le(s(n), s(m)) → le(n, m)
min(cons(0', nil)) → 0'
min(cons(s(n), nil)) → s(n)
min(cons(n, cons(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), cons(n, cons(m, x)))
if_min(true, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(n, x))
if_min(false, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(m, x))
replace(n, m, nil) → nil
replace(n, m, cons(k, x)) → if_replace(eq(n, k), n, m, cons(k, x))
if_replace(true, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(m, x)
if_replace(false, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(k, replace(n, m, x))
sort(nil) → nil
sort(cons(n, x)) → cons(min(cons(n, x)), sort(replace(min(cons(n, x)), n, x)))

Types:
eq :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
0' :: 0':s
true :: true:false
s :: 0':s → 0':s
false :: true:false
le :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
min :: nil:cons → 0':s
cons :: 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
nil :: nil:cons
if_min :: true:false → nil:cons → 0':s
replace :: 0':s → 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
if_replace :: true:false → 0':s → 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
sort :: nil:cons → nil:cons
hole_true:false1_0 :: true:false
hole_0':s2_0 :: 0':s
hole_nil:cons3_0 :: nil:cons
gen_0':s4_0 :: Nat → 0':s
gen_nil:cons5_0 :: Nat → nil:cons

Lemmas:
eq(gen_0':s4_0(n7_0), gen_0':s4_0(n7_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n7₀)
le(gen_0':s4_0(n564_0), gen_0':s4_0(n564_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n564₀)
min(gen_nil:cons5_0(+(1, n893_0))) → gen_0':s4_0(0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n893₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s4_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s4_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s4_0(x))
gen_nil:cons5_0(0) ⇔ nil
gen_nil:cons5_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ cons(0', gen_nil:cons5_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
replace, sort

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
replace < sort

(18) NoRewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Could not prove a rewrite lemma for the defined symbol replace.

(19) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
eq(0', 0') → true
eq(0', s(m)) → false
eq(s(n), 0') → false
eq(s(n), s(m)) → eq(n, m)
le(0', m) → true
le(s(n), 0') → false
le(s(n), s(m)) → le(n, m)
min(cons(0', nil)) → 0'
min(cons(s(n), nil)) → s(n)
min(cons(n, cons(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), cons(n, cons(m, x)))
if_min(true, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(n, x))
if_min(false, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(m, x))
replace(n, m, nil) → nil
replace(n, m, cons(k, x)) → if_replace(eq(n, k), n, m, cons(k, x))
if_replace(true, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(m, x)
if_replace(false, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(k, replace(n, m, x))
sort(nil) → nil
sort(cons(n, x)) → cons(min(cons(n, x)), sort(replace(min(cons(n, x)), n, x)))

Types:
eq :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
0' :: 0':s
true :: true:false
s :: 0':s → 0':s
false :: true:false
le :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
min :: nil:cons → 0':s
cons :: 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
nil :: nil:cons
if_min :: true:false → nil:cons → 0':s
replace :: 0':s → 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
if_replace :: true:false → 0':s → 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
sort :: nil:cons → nil:cons
hole_true:false1_0 :: true:false
hole_0':s2_0 :: 0':s
hole_nil:cons3_0 :: nil:cons
gen_0':s4_0 :: Nat → 0':s
gen_nil:cons5_0 :: Nat → nil:cons

Lemmas:
eq(gen_0':s4_0(n7_0), gen_0':s4_0(n7_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n7₀)
le(gen_0':s4_0(n564_0), gen_0':s4_0(n564_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n564₀)
min(gen_nil:cons5_0(+(1, n893_0))) → gen_0':s4_0(0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n893₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s4_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s4_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s4_0(x))
gen_nil:cons5_0(0) ⇔ nil
gen_nil:cons5_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ cons(0', gen_nil:cons5_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
sort

(20) NoRewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Could not prove a rewrite lemma for the defined symbol sort.

(21) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
eq(0', 0') → true
eq(0', s(m)) → false
eq(s(n), 0') → false
eq(s(n), s(m)) → eq(n, m)
le(0', m) → true
le(s(n), 0') → false
le(s(n), s(m)) → le(n, m)
min(cons(0', nil)) → 0'
min(cons(s(n), nil)) → s(n)
min(cons(n, cons(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), cons(n, cons(m, x)))
if_min(true, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(n, x))
if_min(false, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(m, x))
replace(n, m, nil) → nil
replace(n, m, cons(k, x)) → if_replace(eq(n, k), n, m, cons(k, x))
if_replace(true, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(m, x)
if_replace(false, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(k, replace(n, m, x))
sort(nil) → nil
sort(cons(n, x)) → cons(min(cons(n, x)), sort(replace(min(cons(n, x)), n, x)))

Types:
eq :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
0' :: 0':s
true :: true:false
s :: 0':s → 0':s
false :: true:false
le :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
min :: nil:cons → 0':s
cons :: 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
nil :: nil:cons
if_min :: true:false → nil:cons → 0':s
replace :: 0':s → 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
if_replace :: true:false → 0':s → 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
sort :: nil:cons → nil:cons
hole_true:false1_0 :: true:false
hole_0':s2_0 :: 0':s
hole_nil:cons3_0 :: nil:cons
gen_0':s4_0 :: Nat → 0':s
gen_nil:cons5_0 :: Nat → nil:cons

Lemmas:
eq(gen_0':s4_0(n7_0), gen_0':s4_0(n7_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n7₀)
le(gen_0':s4_0(n564_0), gen_0':s4_0(n564_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n564₀)
min(gen_nil:cons5_0(+(1, n893_0))) → gen_0':s4_0(0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n893₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s4_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s4_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s4_0(x))
gen_nil:cons5_0(0) ⇔ nil
gen_nil:cons5_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ cons(0', gen_nil:cons5_0(x))

No more defined symbols left to analyse.

(22) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The lowerbound Ω(n¹) was proven with the following lemma:
eq(gen_0':s4_0(n7_0), gen_0':s4_0(n7_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n7₀)

(23) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)

(24) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
eq(0', 0') → true
eq(0', s(m)) → false
eq(s(n), 0') → false
eq(s(n), s(m)) → eq(n, m)
le(0', m) → true
le(s(n), 0') → false
le(s(n), s(m)) → le(n, m)
min(cons(0', nil)) → 0'
min(cons(s(n), nil)) → s(n)
min(cons(n, cons(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), cons(n, cons(m, x)))
if_min(true, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(n, x))
if_min(false, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(m, x))
replace(n, m, nil) → nil
replace(n, m, cons(k, x)) → if_replace(eq(n, k), n, m, cons(k, x))
if_replace(true, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(m, x)
if_replace(false, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(k, replace(n, m, x))
sort(nil) → nil
sort(cons(n, x)) → cons(min(cons(n, x)), sort(replace(min(cons(n, x)), n, x)))

Types:
eq :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
0' :: 0':s
true :: true:false
s :: 0':s → 0':s
false :: true:false
le :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
min :: nil:cons → 0':s
cons :: 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
nil :: nil:cons
if_min :: true:false → nil:cons → 0':s
replace :: 0':s → 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
if_replace :: true:false → 0':s → 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
sort :: nil:cons → nil:cons
hole_true:false1_0 :: true:false
hole_0':s2_0 :: 0':s
hole_nil:cons3_0 :: nil:cons
gen_0':s4_0 :: Nat → 0':s
gen_nil:cons5_0 :: Nat → nil:cons

Lemmas:
eq(gen_0':s4_0(n7_0), gen_0':s4_0(n7_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n7₀)
le(gen_0':s4_0(n564_0), gen_0':s4_0(n564_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n564₀)
min(gen_nil:cons5_0(+(1, n893_0))) → gen_0':s4_0(0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n893₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s4_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s4_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s4_0(x))
gen_nil:cons5_0(0) ⇔ nil
gen_nil:cons5_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ cons(0', gen_nil:cons5_0(x))

No more defined symbols left to analyse.

(25) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The lowerbound Ω(n¹) was proven with the following lemma:
eq(gen_0':s4_0(n7_0), gen_0':s4_0(n7_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n7₀)

(26) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)

(27) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
eq(0', 0') → true
eq(0', s(m)) → false
eq(s(n), 0') → false
eq(s(n), s(m)) → eq(n, m)
le(0', m) → true
le(s(n), 0') → false
le(s(n), s(m)) → le(n, m)
min(cons(0', nil)) → 0'
min(cons(s(n), nil)) → s(n)
min(cons(n, cons(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), cons(n, cons(m, x)))
if_min(true, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(n, x))
if_min(false, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(m, x))
replace(n, m, nil) → nil
replace(n, m, cons(k, x)) → if_replace(eq(n, k), n, m, cons(k, x))
if_replace(true, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(m, x)
if_replace(false, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(k, replace(n, m, x))
sort(nil) → nil
sort(cons(n, x)) → cons(min(cons(n, x)), sort(replace(min(cons(n, x)), n, x)))

Types:
eq :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
0' :: 0':s
true :: true:false
s :: 0':s → 0':s
false :: true:false
le :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
min :: nil:cons → 0':s
cons :: 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
nil :: nil:cons
if_min :: true:false → nil:cons → 0':s
replace :: 0':s → 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
if_replace :: true:false → 0':s → 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
sort :: nil:cons → nil:cons
hole_true:false1_0 :: true:false
hole_0':s2_0 :: 0':s
hole_nil:cons3_0 :: nil:cons
gen_0':s4_0 :: Nat → 0':s
gen_nil:cons5_0 :: Nat → nil:cons

Lemmas:
eq(gen_0':s4_0(n7_0), gen_0':s4_0(n7_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n7₀)
le(gen_0':s4_0(n564_0), gen_0':s4_0(n564_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n564₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s4_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s4_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s4_0(x))
gen_nil:cons5_0(0) ⇔ nil
gen_nil:cons5_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ cons(0', gen_nil:cons5_0(x))

No more defined symbols left to analyse.

(28) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The lowerbound Ω(n¹) was proven with the following lemma:
eq(gen_0':s4_0(n7_0), gen_0':s4_0(n7_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n7₀)

(29) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)

(30) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
eq(0', 0') → true
eq(0', s(m)) → false
eq(s(n), 0') → false
eq(s(n), s(m)) → eq(n, m)
le(0', m) → true
le(s(n), 0') → false
le(s(n), s(m)) → le(n, m)
min(cons(0', nil)) → 0'
min(cons(s(n), nil)) → s(n)
min(cons(n, cons(m, x))) → if_min(le(n, m), cons(n, cons(m, x)))
if_min(true, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(n, x))
if_min(false, cons(n, cons(m, x))) → min(cons(m, x))
replace(n, m, nil) → nil
replace(n, m, cons(k, x)) → if_replace(eq(n, k), n, m, cons(k, x))
if_replace(true, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(m, x)
if_replace(false, n, m, cons(k, x)) → cons(k, replace(n, m, x))
sort(nil) → nil
sort(cons(n, x)) → cons(min(cons(n, x)), sort(replace(min(cons(n, x)), n, x)))

Types:
eq :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
0' :: 0':s
true :: true:false
s :: 0':s → 0':s
false :: true:false
le :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
min :: nil:cons → 0':s
cons :: 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
nil :: nil:cons
if_min :: true:false → nil:cons → 0':s
replace :: 0':s → 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
if_replace :: true:false → 0':s → 0':s → nil:cons → nil:cons
sort :: nil:cons → nil:cons
hole_true:false1_0 :: true:false
hole_0':s2_0 :: 0':s
hole_nil:cons3_0 :: nil:cons
gen_0':s4_0 :: Nat → 0':s
gen_nil:cons5_0 :: Nat → nil:cons

Lemmas:
eq(gen_0':s4_0(n7_0), gen_0':s4_0(n7_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n7₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s4_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s4_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s4_0(x))
gen_nil:cons5_0(0) ⇔ nil
gen_nil:cons5_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ cons(0', gen_nil:cons5_0(x))

No more defined symbols left to analyse.

(31) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The lowerbound Ω(n¹) was proven with the following lemma:
eq(gen_0':s4_0(n7_0), gen_0':s4_0(n7_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n7₀)

(32) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)